The WikiLEAKS

After a years period of inactivity, this event captures our attention as the major thunderstorm in the entire planet by now. Almost all internet peoples are either participating or aware of the fact that is happening around the world in cyberspace.

For this entire saga it has numerous frontiers that can be focussed as world first events. And from this blog post we will express our situation in as a view with neutral individial.

WHY WIKILEAKS?
Firstly wiki and something is concerning a major branch of wikipedia until recent eye opener posts from the mainstream media made it clear that its not. However neither press or traditional media can come up in to this extent mainly because three reasons.

one is, because they have a physical location. so that anyone need to find them can find them in the real world without any hassle. Secondly they are still traditional. CNN, BBC or you name it. They are still childes learning internet and cyber civilization. Three and the major is they all looks the world from western eye. Not from a neutral civilian eye.

Even though it says three, there is more facts on wikileaks side. Firstly all mainstream media are directly or indirectly influenced by the jurisdiction, or in clear sense government politics, and are biased towards western rather a common peoples ground. Ultimately all of them having their agenda with how they coverage something. for ex, you may not seen a army 2007 video being criticized by CNN or BBC as far as talking more often of the Iranian nuclear facility.

Secondly, they are not coming from business world who are plainly having big mind but no knowledge. Without having wikileaks, they are fluent in internet communication and the holes and limits of the standards governs the net. (for ex, TCP/IP communication, it need to trust the sender for sending the correct data). Further they have hands on experience in all the needed skills of this age, journalism, jurisdiction of vivid countries, de-centralized infrastructure etc.,

Basically even we do not admit publicly, The US authorities are ruling the world is a fact that everyone countersigned. Until you are their servant you an ally, the time you become the equal (say china) its a big problem and they do the maximum that they can do to let it be in their slave state. For the moment no one is above them (except alliens) if so, this kids play might be at some control.

OK, as per battlefields, there are numerous types. Like Territorial, Financial, Educational, Health etc., and this is knowledge where US army did not made any fair level army to date. Having a commanders of having so much of battle exposure wont make help in info-war.

In wikileaks situations, even without counting the worldwide anger over america's big brother commandment, people are basically judges both wikileaks and Mr assange is facing the same political pressure of US and is rude and unfair.

So the average people will expect a fair justice for them. This is base situation why there is so much of attacks for the parties against the wikileaks. Its not just the freedom of expression, but also is fair play.

In internet, even though some brilliant Yankees made it, they made it resilient even under nuclear attack and is strong that no one jurisdiction can control it, to control you have to cut all regions apart. We don't think thats possible in a world like today.

Although US has many frontiers, in all of them US has the priority. But in internet, no matter who you are, even you are government or not, all are just same and having the same interface to all of the participants.

So, there is no one above or below to anyone. Where US is highly concerned to make them superior than other.

This all play is about power. US need to place everyone behind them. they do whatever they can for make it true. Its not national security of USA, but the high and mighty rudeness of peoples handling the US government.

Which ultimately is challenged by both wikileaks and anonymous.